During a recent trip to London, we had the opportunity to sit down with executives from six UK-based banks, including teams from two High Street banks and four from what are commonly referred to as “Challenger banks”. In this note, we review our stance on U.K. banks, provide a brief breakdown of the market, and discuss our key takeaways from the trip.
Insights: Subsector
Notes from the Field: U.S. Mid-Cap Bank Meetings in New York
We recently attended a U.S. financial services conference in New York City and had the opportunity to meet with executives from seven mid-cap banks. These meetings were of particular importance to us, as the Hamilton Capital Global Bank ETF (HBG) has ~46% of NAV invested in the U.S., with the majority of that in banks with less than US$50 bln in assets. Given the relatively low…
CIBC: On PVTB, Why We Agree with the Higher Bid (and Two Reasons Why it Should Not be Raised Further)
In this ETF Comment, we: (a) explain why we agree with CIBC’s decision to increase its bid for PVTB, and (b) provide two reasons why the bank should walk away from their bid, if this new price is not accepted.
JPM Investor Day: Capital Return, Tax Reform, and Interest Rates
As we have written in the past, in the Hamilton Capital Global Bank ETF (HBG), we generally prefer mid-cap U.S. banks over their larger peers. With respect to the Hamilton Capital Global Financials Yield ETF (HFY), our U.S. bank allocation is very small (~6%), because yields for the sector are among the lowest in global banking (although we expect them to rise in the next two…
U.S. Banks: Another Tough Quarter for Mega-Caps as All Four Experience Negative Q/Q EPS Growth (and Four-Year Near-Zero Growth Trend Persists)
On February 7th, 2017, we will be launching the Hamilton Capital Global Financials Yield ETF (HFY). It is the aspiration of HFY to generate “REIT-like yields, with positive rate sensitivity”. Therefore, we anticipate that HFY would have close to zero exposure to the four mega-cap banks primarily while their yields are very low. There are nearly 400 global financials with yields in excess of 5%, and…
Another U.S. Mid-Cap Bank Holding to be Acquired
Last night, it was announced that another Hamilton Capital Global Bank ETF (HGB) holding was being acquired, the second in 8 months. Along with greater EPS growth, lower regulatory risk, and higher interest rate sensitivity, this highlights one of the other reasons / themes why we prefer the U.S. mid-cap banks to their mega-cap peers: the potential for consolidation.
Are REITs Set to Underperform the Financials?
We are pleased to announce the launch of the Hamilton Capital Global Financials Yield ETF (HFY), which will begin trading on the TSX on Tuesday, February 7th. The objective of the ETF is to offer attractive distribution potential. Put differently, our aspiration is for the ETF to have “REIT-like yields, but with positive rate sensitivity”. Although REITs were recently separated from certain financial services indices (for…
Canadian Banks: Why U.S. Mid-Caps are Easier to Acquire (than 10 Years Ago)
In the Hamilton Capital Global Bank ETF (HBG; TSX), we generally seek to hold 50% North American banks, with an emphasis on the ~200 publicly traded U.S. mid-cap banks (those firms with <$100 bln in assets). As of the time of writing, HBG had exposure to 23 U.S. banks representing 43% of the ETF’s net asset value.
WFC: A Canadian Bank Counterfactual as it Enters Year #4 of No Growth
We generally have minimal exposure to the global mega-cap banks primarily because of their very low EPS growth, higher regulatory risk, and relative to their mid-cap peers, materially lower interest rate sensitivity. In this Insight, we explain why we believe “slow growth” WFC basically represents a Canadian bank counterfactual.
OCC Letter Shows WFC is Not Out of the Regulatory Woods Yet
As we have written in prior Insights, Wells Fargo (“WFC”) – like its other mega-cap peers – continues to struggle to generate earnings growth. The mega-caps also struggle with regulatory risk; before the recent U.S. election, we cautioned that the risk that regulators were shifting their focus from the capital markets banks to the largest regionals appeared to be rising. WFC was a prime example, coping…
U.S. Banks: C, JPM, BAC, and WFC Continue Multi-Year Trend of Close to Zero EPS Growth
As we have indicated in prior commentary, we have zero exposure to the U.S. mega-cap banks, primarily because of their very low EPS growth, mid-single digit ROEs (in the case of C and BAC), and very high regulatory risk (see “Five Reasons We Don’t Own C, JPM and BAC”, June 14th). We favour a portfolio of U.S. banks derived from the nearly 200 publicly traded U.S.…
Canadian Banks: Revisiting our “End of an Era” Thesis (Five Years Later)
In May 2011, we wrote an essay entitled “The Canadian Banks – The End of an Era”. In this essay – which was excerpted in the Globe and Mail – we explained why the Canadian banks were entering a period in which their two-decade period of double digit EPS/dividend growth was ending. Specifically, we identified three reasons supporting this thesis: (i) the drivers of the sector’s…